Whether you’re building one for your customers, employees, or partners, a well-designed certification program can be a powerful lever for learning, engagement, and measurable business growth.
But success takes more than just creating an exam and issuing a badge. Great certifications are grounded in learning science, built with rigor, and continuously maintained for relevance and trust.
We recently sat down with Maria Szczech, Certification Program Manager for Meta Blueprint, to gain insight into how Meta approaches the design of certifications. In this article, we unpack Maria’s proven best practices you can apply to your own certification strategy.
1. Start with the “Why”: Certifications That Matter
Before you design a single question or badge, you must be able to answer one deceptively simple question: Why are we building this certification—and for whom?
Certifications should solve a real problem and deliver value to both the learner and the business. Maria’s team at Meta begins each new initiative with a validation process to ensure the certification meets three core criteria:
- Clear purpose: What skill gap or business need are we addressing? Is a certification truly the right solution, or would a course or microlearning path suffice?
- Defined audience: Who exactly is this for? If it’s “for everyone,” it’s actually for no one.
- Tangible value: Why would someone invest their time to earn this credential? What will it mean for their credibility, career, or organization?
In other words, if your certification doesn’t deliver obvious value for the learner, it won’t succeed. The “big C” certifications—those high-stakes, industry-recognized credentials—must feel earned and meaningful.
2. Role-Based vs. Skills-Based: Choosing the Right Model
Historically, many certification programs were focused on a role. Meta had certifications for Digital Marketers, Community Managers, and more.
Today, more organizations (including Meta) are differentiating between role-based and skills-based certifications:
- Role-based certifications validate proficiency for a complete job function (e.g., media planner, data analyst).
- Skills-based certifications measure transferable competencies—like data literacy or creative strategy—that apply across roles and industries.
This dual approach reflects a future-proof mindset. Roles evolve, but core skills endure. As industries transform, skills-based certifications help learners stay relevant and signal adaptability to employers.
For many organizations, starting with a skills-based focus can make certification more flexible, scalable, and sustainable.
3. Build a Strong Business Case
A certification is not just a learning product—it’s a business initiative.
Before launching, ask:
- What KPIs will define success? (e.g., adoption, skill gains, business outcomes)
- How will we measure and report impact?
- What are the consequences of not launching? (the “cost of inaction”)
This business case ensures you align stakeholders, secure executive sponsorship, and avoid “certification creep”—where enthusiasm outpaces strategy.
4. Follow a Structured Development Process
Designing a rigorous, trusted certification takes time and cross-functional collaboration. Meta’s process includes:
Program Design
Define purpose, goals, and audience. Is this an entry-level or advanced credential? What’s in and out of scope?
Job Task or Skills Analysis
Gather subject matter experts (SMEs) to identify the critical tasks, skills, and knowledge areas the certification should assess. Run a job task analysis to ensure you’re testing what actually matters for real-world performance. This will become the scientific backbone of your program.
Blueprint Development
Translate that analysis into an “exam blueprint,” mapping out content areas and their relative weight on the test.
This guarantees balance and validity and ensures no topic is over- or underrepresented.
Item (Question) Development
SMEs are trained in recognized item-writing standards to ensure each question accurately measures the intended skill or knowledge area. This training includes best practices to avoid bias, ambiguity, or “testwise” flaws. Distractors (the incorrect answer choices) must be wrong but plausible, reflecting realistic misconceptions.
While the certification team is developing exam items, Meta’s instructional design team simultaneously builds learning materials to support candidates’ preparation for the exam. This ensures content development reflects what learners need to know to pass the assessment.
Standard Setting
Determine the cut score, or the minimum passing threshold. At Meta, this involves workshops where SMEs evaluate the difficulty of each question and debate what a “minimally qualified candidate” should know. The goal here is to make sure that the passing score reflects the level of competency required for successful completion of the certification.
Quality Assurance and Ongoing Maintenance
After launch, continuously monitor exam performance data:
- Are high-performing candidates missing certain items?
- Are regional or language differences affecting outcomes?
- Are new tools or processes emerging that require blueprint updates?
Before you begin developing your certification, consider the cost of maintenance over time. Like many other types of education, your certification will need to be updated as things change.
5. Design for Learning Science
A certification is both a learning experience and an assessment experience.
To maximize learning outcomes:
- Use spaced and varied practice. Instead of one big final test, intersperse smaller quizzes to reinforce recall and reduce cognitive load.
- Balance formative and summative assessment. Use low-stakes checks (like knowledge quizzes) alongside high-stakes certification exams.
- Provide feedback loops. Even small insights (“You may want to review X”) increase motivation and retention.
- Align objectives with assessment. Each question should directly map to a learning objective. This prevents surprises and ensures you’re measuring what the learning was intended to achieve.
As Maria noted, “Sometimes we hear learners say, ‘I don’t think I ever learned that.’ That’s a signal that our assessment and learning design are misaligned.”
6. Choose the Right Level of Rigor: High-Stakes vs. Low-Stakes
Not every certification needs to be “proctored and psychometrically validated.”
- High-stakes certifications (like Meta’s) are proctored, scored through standard-setting studies, and require ongoing reliability analysis. These are ideal for credentials that carry reputational weight or external recognition.
- Low-stakes certifications (or microcredentials) are faster to launch and easier to maintain. They’re great for formative learning, upskilling, or recognition within a closed ecosystem.
If you’re just starting your certification journey, a low-stakes approach can be a smart on-ramp. You can later evolve into a high-stakes model once you have sufficient audience demand, SME resources, and operational maturity.
7. Engage and Appreciate Your SMEs
Subject matter experts are the backbone of every certification. But they’re often volunteers balancing other priorities.
Meta maintains SME engagement through a “SME Appreciation Program” that includes recognition, shoutouts, thank-you letters, manager visibility, and even swag.
This isn’t fluff. Psychological research on motivation shows that recognition fuels sustained contribution. By fostering belonging and appreciation, you create a virtuous cycle of participation and quality. (Here’s more on collaborating with SMEs.)
8. Measure, Maintain, and Evolve
A great certification is never finished. Meta conducts exam health checks several times a year, reviewing:
- Pass rates and question difficulty
- Regional or demographic performance differences
- Item reliability and correlation data
- Emerging industry shifts
They also perform an annual job task review—a “mini refresh” that updates the blueprint as technology and job realities evolve.
This process reflects the learning science principle of continuous calibration: to stay valid, an assessment must continuously reflect the domain it represents.
9. Leverage AI Thoughtfully
AI tools can streamline some aspects of certification design—like drafting question stems, generating distractors, or identifying content gaps—but they don’t replace human expertise.
Meta’s SMEs use AI as a support tool, rather than a content generator. For example:
- Refining question wording for clarity
- Checking alignment between learning objectives and exam questions
- Identifying potential inconsistencies or coverage gaps
Used well, AI can enhance efficiency while maintaining psychometric integrity. (Check out other uses for AI in education here.)
10. Think Ecosystem, Not Exam
The best certification programs don’t live in isolation—they anchor an entire learning ecosystem.
High-performing organizations integrate certifications into:
- Learning paths and on-demand training
- Partner enablement programs
- Career frameworks and performance reviews
- Marketing campaigns and customer success stories
A certification is a signal of mastery. The more your ecosystem recognizes and rewards that signal, the more valuable it becomes.
Key Takeaways
If you remember just five things from this guide, make them these:
- Start with value for both the learner AND the business.
- Design with rigor. Use job task analysis, blueprints, and standard-setting.
- Keep it alive. Review, refresh, and update regularly.
- Engage your experts. SME appreciation isn’t optional; it’s necessary.
- Build for learning, not just testing. Ground your certification in how people actually learn.
A well-designed certification helps learners build confidence, organizations scale expertise, and industries establish standards of excellence. As Maria put it, when people earn a certification that truly reflects their skills, “it builds trust, opens opportunities, and helps businesses grow smarter.”
Whether you’re building your first credential or refining a global program, start with intention, apply learning science, and never stop iterating.
.png)
